57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofil

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Anzahl der Tests
23
3
3
14
Optimale Position
#1
#4
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
4.3
3.7
3.6
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
176
97
34
188

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%

Schnee

Schnee
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Bremsen auf Schnee
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Schnee Handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Schneetraktion
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Schnee Slalom
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Schneeleistung
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Nass

Nass
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Handling - nass
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Preis-Wert
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Komfort
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Eis

Eis
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich