57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
4
4
23
3
28
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
3.3
3.7
2.3
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
123
111
40
176
36
67

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich