56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Anzahl der Tests
10
14
Optimale Position
#2
#8
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
13.4
Neuester Test
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
123
104
153

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich