57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
4
6
28
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#3
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.1
12.0
4.7
2.3
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
123
40
47
111
146
67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen