Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22

VS

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Efficientgrip SUV

Roadhawk

Ecsta HS52

UltraGrip Performance 3

Anzahl der Tests

—

21

10

24

Optimale Position

—

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

—

11.9

6.0

2.7

Neuester Test

—

2024

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

123

164

104

302

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

86%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

100%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Innengeräusche

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Efficientgrip SUV

Roadhawk

Ecsta HS52

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Kosten

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen