Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22

VS

Obere-Mittelklasse

Falken

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Efficientgrip SUV

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Anzahl der Tests

—

3

5

3

2

Optimale Position

—

#2

#1

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

—

3.7

2.2

3.3

1.0

Neuester Test

—

2025

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

123

34

63

40

23

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip SUV

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Kosten

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen