Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Vredestein ULTRAC gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ULTRAC

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Anzahl der Tests

3

—

4

3

5

Optimale Position

#2

—

#3

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

3.3

—

12.0

3.7

2.2

Neuester Test

2026

—

2025

Verfügbare Größen

40

—

111

34

63

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Vredestein ULTRAC

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Vredestein ULTRAC

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Vredestein ULTRAC

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Vredestein ULTRAC

93%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Seitenführung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Vredestein ULTRAC

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Vredestein ULTRAC

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Vredestein ULTRAC

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Vredestein ULTRAC

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Vredestein ULTRAC

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Vredestein ULTRAC

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Vredestein ULTRAC

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Innengeräusche

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Vredestein ULTRAC

86%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Vredestein ULTRAC

56%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Vredestein ULTRAC

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Vredestein ULTRAC

29%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Vredestein ULTRAC gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ULTRAC

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen