56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Viking WinTech gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Viking WinTechBudget
VikingViking

WinTech

5.3
R13 – R20
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

9.5
R14 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 WinterContact TS 870

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Viking
WinTech
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Anzahl der Tests
3
6
1
3
24
Optimale Position
#2
#11
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
20.8
1.0
3.7
2.7
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
59
64
34
302

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Viking WinTech
55%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Viking WinTech
61%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Viking WinTech
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Viking WinTech
52%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Viking WinTech
46%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Viking WinTech
62%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Nassleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Viking WinTech
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Viking WinTech
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Viking WinTech
62%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Viking WinTech
59%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Viking WinTech
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Viking WinTech
66%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Viking WinTech
61%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Viking WinTech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Viking WinTech
72%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Viking WinTech
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich