57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Continental PremiumContact 6

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Semperit
Speed-Life 3
Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Anzahl der Tests
4
14
21
36
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
18.1
11.9
3.1
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2024
2023
Verfügbare Größen
40
116
165
303

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Nassfahrverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
56%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich