Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Nokian WetProof gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WetProof

Blizzak 6

Primacy 5

Anzahl der Tests

3

14

3

Optimale Position

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

3.3

5.6

3.6

4.7

Neuester Test

2026

2023

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

40

47

188

126

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian WetProof

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Nokian WetProof

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Nokian WetProof

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Nokian WetProof

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Nokian WetProof

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Nassleistung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Nokian WetProof

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Michelin Primacy 5

79%

Seitenführung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Nokian WetProof

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

87%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Nokian WetProof

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian WetProof

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Michelin Primacy 5

76%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian WetProof

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Michelin Primacy 5

69%

Trockenleistung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Nokian WetProof

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Michelin Primacy 5

88%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Nokian WetProof

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

67%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Nokian WetProof

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Nokian WetProof

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Nokian WetProof

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Nokian WetProof

53%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Innengeräusche

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Nokian WetProof

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Nokian WetProof

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Nokian WetProof

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Nokian WetProof

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Nokian WetProof gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WetProof

Blizzak 6

Primacy 5

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen