57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Michelin Primacy 5Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 5

8.4
R16 – R21
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7
R13 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
PILOT ALPIN 5 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Anzahl der Tests
3
3
3
14
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#4
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
4.7
4.3
3.6
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
126
97
188

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Nassleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Michelin Primacy 5
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich