57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
4
5
18
6
28
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
4.8
6.1
4.7
2.3
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
158
47
146
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen