57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Falken e.Ziex

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Michelin Primacy 4+Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 4+

7.6
R16 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Continental UltraContact NXTPremium
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.9
R16 – R20
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 Cinturato (C3) PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
4
13
18
3
3
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
4.3
6.1
1.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
123
47
23
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -Reifen für ElektrofahrzeugeBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Auch vergleichen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.PrimacyMichelin Primacy 4+ vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Michelin Primacy 4+ vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Michelin Primacy 4+ vs Michelin Primacy 4Michelin Primacy 4+ vs Continental PremiumContact 7

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenGTMaxxis

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen