58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
4
13
4
18
7
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
4.3
3.8
6.1
2.3
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2026
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
123
36
47
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Falken e.Ziex
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
Falken e.Ziex
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
82%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.