56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 gegen Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Anzahl der Tests
3
4
24
29
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
12.0
2.7
3.7
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
111
302
178

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Nassleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
86%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
37%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich