Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Dunlop Winter gegen Falken e.Ziex

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Testprofil

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Winter

e.Ziex

Anzahl der Tests

3

4

5

3

2

3

Optimale Position

#2

#3

#1

#2

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

3.3

12.0

2.2

3.7

1.5

3.7

Neuester Test

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

40

111

63

34

65

34

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Seitenführung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Dunlop Winter gegen Falken e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Winter

e.Ziex

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen