57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental WinterContact TS 870 P gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Anzahl der Tests
4
4
29
14
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
12.0
3.7
3.6
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
111
180
194
Vertrauensniveau
Medium confidence

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Nassfahrverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen