57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
10
21
14
4
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#2
#8
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.0
11.9
13.4
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
109
165
153
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Nassfahrverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen