Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

CrossClimate 2

UltraContact NXT

Anzahl der Tests

3

23

24

2

Optimale Position

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

3.3

2.7

1.0

Neuester Test

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

40

176

151

23

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

83%

Innengeräusche

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

62%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

CrossClimate 2

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen