Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Dunlop Winter gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Testprofil

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Winter

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Anzahl der Tests

3

23

5

3

2

5

Optimale Position

#2

#1

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

3.3

2.2

3.7

1.5

2.2

Neuester Test

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

40

176

63

34

65

63

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Innengeräusche

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Dunlop Winter gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Winter

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen