Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Testprofil

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Pilot Sport 4 S

Anzahl der Tests

3

23

3

10

Optimale Position

#2

#1

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

3.3

3.7

2.1

Neuester Test

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

40

176

34

193

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

75%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

88%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

84%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

87%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

85%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

88%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

83%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

95%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

96%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

75%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

70%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

73%

Innengeräusche

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Pilot Sport 4 S

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen