57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
4
5
14
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.1
12.0
2.8
3.6
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
47
111
139
194

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen