57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
1
24
1
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.1
1.0
2.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
47
27
151
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen