57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
21
13
5
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.1
11.9
4.3
2.8
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
47
165
123
139

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich