57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Cooper Zeon CS8 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Cooper
Zeon CS8
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
14
14
3
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#8
#9
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.1
13.4
19.7
3.7
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2026
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
47
153
147
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Cooper Zeon CS8
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Cooper Zeon CS8
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Cooper Zeon CS8
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Cooper Zeon CS8
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Cooper Zeon CS8
79%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Cooper Zeon CS8
76%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Cooper Zeon CS8
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Cooper Zeon CS8
59%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Cooper Zeon CS8
89%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Cooper Zeon CS8
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Cooper Zeon CS8
60%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Cooper Zeon CS8
52%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Cooper Zeon CS8
49%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Cooper Zeon CS8
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen