57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Fulda EcoControl HP2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
8
14
21
4
Optimale Position
#2
#4
#8
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
12.8
13.4
11.9
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2026
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
30
153
165
40

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Nassfahrverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich