57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
21
4
3
18
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
11.9
12.0
3.7
6.1
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2025
2024
Verfügbare Größen
40
165
111
36
47
Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen