Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Roadhawk

Advantage

UltraContact NXT

Anzahl der Tests

3

21

14

2

Optimale Position

#2

#8

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

3.3

11.9

13.4

1.0

Neuester Test

2026

2024

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

40

164

153

23

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Nassleistung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Firestone Roadhawk

24%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Seitenführung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Trockenleistung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Firestone Roadhawk

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Innengeräusche

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

93%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Roadhawk

Advantage

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen