57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Michelin
Primacy 5
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
4
6
18
5
5
3
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#1
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
4.7
6.1
2.2
4.8
3.7
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
146
47
63
158
36

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich