57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
4
3
4
18
1
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
1.3
12.0
6.1
1.0
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2025
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
23
111
47
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen