57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
4
28
4
6
3
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#3
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
2.3
12.0
4.7
3.7
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
67
111
146
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen