56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
3
36
4
6
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#3
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
3.1
12.0
4.7
Neuester Test
2026
2023
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
296
111
146

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Nassleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
58%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich