57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Falken e.Ziex

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 6Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 6

7.6
R15 – R22
Firestone RoadhawkObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 4 S

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Firestone
Roadhawk
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
3
36
21
3
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
3.1
11.9
3.7
Neuester Test
2026
2023
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
296
164
34

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Nassleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich