57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
14
1
24
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
3.6
1.0
2.7
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
194
66
151

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Nassfahrverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen