56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
BFGoodrich AdvantageObere-Mittelklasse
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 4 S

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
3
14
10
3
Optimale Position
#2
#8
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
13.4
6.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
153
104
60

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Nassleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich