57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
4
14
5
18
5
Optimale Position
#2
#8
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
13.4
2.8
6.1
4.8
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2026
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
153
139
47
158

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen