56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Primacy 5

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
BFGoodrich AdvantageObere-Mittelklasse
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Firestone RoadhawkObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Michelin Primacy 5Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 5

8.4
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
3
14
21
3
3
Optimale Position
#2
#8
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
13.4
11.9
3.7
4.7
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
153
164
34
126

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Nassleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Michelin Primacy 5
79%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
88%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich