56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Falken e.Ziex

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
BFGoodrich AdvantageObere-Mittelklasse
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Continental PremiumContact 6Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 6

7.6
R15 – R22
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
3
14
36
3
Optimale Position
#2
#8
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
13.4
3.1
3.7
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2023
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
153
296
34

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Nassleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich