57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
13
5
6
4
3
4
Optimale Position
#5
#1
#1
#3
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.0
4.3
2.2
4.7
3.3
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
123
63
146
40
36
40

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich