57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
10
18
4
5
3
Optimale Position
#5
#2
#1
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.0
6.0
6.1
12.0
2.2
3.7
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2024
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
109
47
111
63
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen