57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
4
5
3
28
Optimale Position
#5
#2
#3
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.0
3.3
12.0
2.2
3.7
2.3
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
111
63
36
67

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich