58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
10
14
4
4
Optimale Position
#5
#2
#2
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.0
3.3
6.0
3.6
3.8
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
109
194
36
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken e.Ziex
67%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
65%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Falken e.Ziex
65%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.