57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
1
13
3
Optimale Position
#5
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.0
5.5
3.3
1.0
4.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2024
2023
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
153
40
66
123
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen