57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
21
4
18
5
3
Optimale Position
#5
#2
#3
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.0
11.9
12.0
6.1
2.8
3.7
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2025
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
165
111
47
139
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen