57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Compact
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
4
18
6
1
5
Optimale Position
#10
#3
#2
#1
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.0
12.0
3.3
6.1
4.7
1.0
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
42
111
40
47
146
66
63

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
39%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
34%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
43%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich