57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Cargo
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
13
18
3
4
1
4
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
2.0
4.3
6.1
3.7
3.3
1.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2019
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
43
123
47
36
40
66
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
95%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen