56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Cargo
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
1
2
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
2.0
12.0
1.0
1.0
Neuester Test
2019
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
43
111
64
23

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich