57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Goodyear Efficientgrip CargoPremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip Cargo

R14 – R17
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Michelin Primacy 4+Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 4+

7.6
R16 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Cargo
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
18
13
3
3
1
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
2.0
12.0
6.1
4.3
3.7
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2019
2025
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
43
111
47
123
34
40
64

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich