57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Cargo
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
10
18
4
13
4
6
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
2.0
6.0
6.1
3.3
4.3
3.3
4.7
Neuester Test
2019
2026
2024
2026
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
43
109
47
40
123
40
146

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen