57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Cargo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
3
4
6
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#3
#1
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
2.0
5.5
12.0
1.3
3.3
4.7
Neuester Test
2019
2023
2025
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
43
153
111
23
40
146

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen